Lachlan R Dale

Malcolm Turnbull: Too much of a muchness?

Image: AAP

Lachlan R. Dale analyses our new PM Malcolm Turnbull’s words thus far and speculates on the reversal of attitude for the Liberal Party.

 

Tony Abbott will not be missed. In opposition, he was a man who relentlessly bludgeoned both Labor and the press with three word slogans, but as Prime Minister, that sort of base politicking was never going to fly.

As Abbott took control of the Australian Government, many pundits wondered whether this battered political brawler could tone down his aggression and transition into the mode of a statesman; a unifier who could articulate coherent arguments for necessary, but difficult reform.

Well, the last two years have definitely answered that question. Abbott has proven he lacks the political skill to be anything other than a polemicist. The disdain with which he has treated the Australian public has shaken even the most cynical among us as he blatantly broke election promises, heaped flag upon flag into his already crowded conference room, and quietly swept his manufactured “budget emergency” under the carpet.

The damage he has done to the trust of the electorate is deep. Will Malcolm Turnbull really be any better? Well, let’s begin by examining the messaging from the press conference in which he announced his leadership challenge.

Turnbull opened by sating conservatives concerned with a worsening budget deficit, slowing growth and creeping unemployment:

“It is clear enough that the Government is not successful in providing the economic leadership that we need. It is not the fault of individual ministers.”

“Ultimately, the Prime Minister has not been capable of providing the economic leadership our nation needs.”

“He has not been capable of providing the economic confidence that business needs.”

He then appealed to his role as a unifier – as an individual who intends to lift the horrifically diseased standards of political office:

“…we need a different style of leadership… A style of leadership that respects the people’s intelligence, that explains these complex issues and then sets out the course of action we believe we should take and makes a case for it.”

“We need advocacy, not slogans. We need to respect the intelligence of the Australian people.”

Followed by an appeal to his own party:

 “We need to restore traditional Cabinet government. There must be an end to policy on the run and captain’s calls.”

And then, as a finale, offered his core vision with a careful nod towards the core principles of both progressives and conservatives alike:

“Remember this, the only way, the only way we can ensure that we remain a high wage, generous social welfare net, first world society is if we have outstanding economic leadership, if we have strong business confidence.”

“That is what we in the Liberal Party are bound to deliver and it’s what I am committed to deliver if the party room gives me their support as leader of the party.”

Ahh yes, the bittersweet taste of a politician’s promise. At an entirely superficial level, it is pleasing to hear an articulate individual announce he intends to reverse Abbott’s devaluation of political discourse. In this small way Turnbull does offer some form of hope.

Whether he is capable of (or even interested in) enacting any sort of centrist reformation of the Liberal Party remains to be seen. Who knows what sort of heinous conservative policies he will have to embrace to shore up the support of Liberal Right. Turnbull has already indicated no change of policy regarding climate change or same-sex marriage and he certainly has a history of chameleon-like behaviour, happily towing the party line for the deeply regressive 2014 Federal Budget when it suited him.

This is the wildcard of a Turnbull Prime Ministership: will he be as willing as Abbott to negate personal principles for political gain? Does he have the stomach to address the divisiveness of partisan politics? The skill to play the unifier? The support to resist the Liberal Party’s lurch to the far right? The common sense to reject the deregulation of university fees? The sanity to roll back the war on journalists and whistleblowers? The foresight to invest in clean energy?

Time will tell how much of the man is branding versus substance.

The removal of the Abbottian cancer from the Prime Ministership is thoroughly worth celebrating, but there is still much work to be done before our political system can be taken off life-support. To be stuck between two equally uninspiring parties does not a healthy democracy make. Hopefully this deposition, one of many in recent years, will demonstrate just how bored the Australian public is of inept democracy.

Malcolm Turnbull. We’ll be watching you.

Related posts

3 Comments

  1. Pingback: Music Download Mp3

  2. Pingback: mp3 download

  3. Rainer the cabbie said:

    It will be interesting to see how Malcolm will embrace all those challenges you mentioned. For now I take a wait and see approach having watched Julia Gillard come in with the same rethoric of uniting cabinet and ending up with the biggest shitfight any party leader has ever endured.

    As to Turnbulls failure to speak up and tow the line; maybe he was setting an example for his future ministers to stand by decisions made by caucus. Just because he is a small L liberal didn’t give him the right to cross the floor on every policy agreements.

    Let give him a fair go, which I hope will also apply to the MSM. Main thing is that we hopefully got rid of the most destructive right wing front bench this nation has ever seen. It was the Tea Party in power, an experiment I hope will never be repeated anywhere.

    Let this also be a wake up call for the Labour Party. Their Leader stinks to high heaven and they have some incredible talent behind him who will be up to the challenge. Go Tanya and Anthony!

Comments are closed.

Top
Share via