- Our national security laws are allowing whistleblowers to be tried in secret
- Morrison is tied to the sports rorts scandal by 136 emails, catching him in another lie
- Moree: A place of ancient beauty and contemporary ugliness
- WhatsApp glitch leaves 470,000 private groups vulnerable
- Under-funded and under-resourced: Australia’s domestic violence loop
Every Friday, The Big Smoke looks at industry news curated by MediaScope. This week: State of the Media Report 2017, can advertising support a free Internet and “What are you going to do about it?”.
State of the Media Report 2017 (Digital Media – MediaBriefing)
This “illuminating” report is generated through a survey of hundreds of C-level readers – all condensed into a 90 minute briefing, covering all the means of revenue generation, from data to video.
Just the facts, please – In our industry as well as politics (Dave Morgan – MediaPost)
Our media world today gives highly visible soapboxes to an almost infinite supply of self-proclaimed or dubiously anointed “experts” with little or no regard for the veracity of what they say, or their qualifications for saying it. In fact, those with the more-extreme arguments are more likely to get links and airtime and appear on carousels and scrollers (thank you, content marketing).
The fragmentation of media has created echo chambers of sameness and self-selection bias that only makes things worse. This is a real problem that our media and news organisations need to solve, not just exploit.
When we think about the importance of bringing more fact-based discourse to these critical national and global issues impacting all of humanity, we’re bound to realise the similar problems in our own industry.
We wouldn’t have had nearly the problems affecting us today with fraud, viewability and bots if the companies allocating those many billions of dollars of wasted shareholder money had immersed themselves more in the facts of how the digital ad ecosystem operated — instead of just chasing the bright, shiny object of participating in the digital, social, mobile-first world that they read and talk about everyday.
The same can probably be said for the nonsensical, maniacal focus so many marketers have today on appealing to “millennials”.
Can advertising support a free Internet? (David Benady – Guardian)
Supporters of an open, democratic Internet, funded mainly by advertising, are facing some big questions about how their vision will unfold. A freely accessible digital world, where websites and social networks are open to all, is the dream of many. But critics wonder if this is desirable or even possible.
Brands have shifted a huge proportion of their marketing budgets into online advertising in recent years, fuelling the growth of the Internet and becoming the main source of funding for most websites and social networks. But while many campaigns hit the spot, others can be irritating, intrusive and irrelevant.
How can advertisers and web publishers make sure ad campaigns are effective and entertaining enough to pay the Internet’s bills, while ensuring online services don’t disappear behind a series of privately accessed paywalls? This was the topic of a recent roundtable discussion.
“What are you going to do about it?” Industry pros share their actions at 3% Conference (Doug Zanger– TheDrum)
The theme of this year’s 3% Conference is “What are you going to do about it?”. From conversation comes tangible action – both large and sweeping at agencies and brands and especially for individuals. These “micro-actions” are the things people will do each day, no matter the level, to impact positive change around gender. During this year’s conference, several industry people were asked: “What are you going to do about it?”