Ingrid Anderson

What American history reveals about surges in antisemitism and anti-immigrant sentiment

pitts

While Pittsburgh’s synagogue shooting might be the most recent, America has a history of violence emboldened by official anti-rhetoric. 

 

 

The shooting at the Tree of Life Congregation in Pittsburgh is believed to be the deadliest attack on Jews in American history. Eleven people were killed when the gunman burst in on the congregation’s morning worship service carrying an assault rifle and three handguns.

The suspect, Robert Bowers, is reported to be a frequent user of Gab, a social networking site that is becoming increasingly popular among white nationalists and other alt-right groups. He is alleged to have regularly reposted antisemitic slurs, expressed virulent anti-immigrant sentiments, called immigrants “invaders”, and claimed that Jews are “the enemy of white people”.

The magnitude of the Pittsburgh synagogue massacre may be unprecedented, but it is only the latest in the series of hate crimes against Jews. In February 2017, more than 100 gravestones were vandalised at a cemetery outside of St Louis, Missouri, and at another Jewish cemetery in Philadelphia. Indeed, hate crimes have been on an increase against minority religions, people of colour and immigrants. In the 10 days following the 2016 presidential election, nearly 900 hate-motivated incidents were reported, many on college campuses. Many of these incidents targeted Muslims, people of colour and immigrants, along with Jews.

This outpouring of anti-immigrant and antisemitic sentiment is reminiscent in many ways of the political climate during the years between the first and second world wars in the US or the interwar period.

In its early years, the United States maintained an “open door policy” that drew millions of immigrants from all religions to enter the country, including Jews. Between 1820 and 1880, over 9 million immigrants entered America.

As a Jewish studies scholar, I am all too aware that by the early 1880s, American nativists – people who believed that the “genetic stock” of Northern Europe was superior to that of Southern and Eastern Europe – began pushing for the exclusion of “foreigners”, whom they “viewed with deep suspicion”.

In fact, as scholar Barbara Bailin writes, most of the immigrants, who were from Southern, Central and Eastern Europe, “were considered so different in composition, religion, and culture from earlier immigrants as to trigger a xenophobic reaction that served to generate more restrictive immigration laws.”


Also on The Big Smoke


In August 1882, Congress responded to increasing concerns about America’s “open door” policy and passed the Immigration Act of 1882, which included a provision denying entry to “any convict, lunatic, idiot or any person unable to take care of himself without becoming a public charge”.

However, enforcement was not strict, in part because immigration officers working at the points of entry were expected to implement these restrictions as they saw fit.

In fact, it was during the late 19th century that the American “melting pot” was born: nearly 22 million immigrants from all over the world entered the US between 1881 and 1914.

They included approximately 1,500,000 European Jews hoping to escape the longstanding legally enforced antisemitism of many parts of the European continent, which limited where Jews could live, what kinds of universities they could attend and what kinds of professions they could hold.

 

Fear of Jews and immigrants

Nativists continued to rail against the demographic shifts and in particular, took issue with the high numbers of Jews and Southern Italians entering the country.

These fears were eventually reflected in the makeup of Congress, since the electorate voted increasing numbers of nativist congresspeople into office who vowed to change immigration laws with their constituent’s anti-immigrant sentiments in mind.

Immigrants on Ellis Island. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, DC 20540 USA

Nativist and isolationist sentiment in America only increased, as Europe fell headlong into World War I, “the war to end all wars”. On February 4th, 1917, Congress passed the Immigration Act of 1917, which reversed America’s open door policy and denied entry to the majority of immigrants seeking entry. As a result, between 1918 and 1921, only 20,019 Jews were admitted into the US.

The 1924 Immigration Act tightened the borders further. It transferred the decision to admit or deny immigrants from the immigration officers at the port of entry to the Foreign Services Office, which issued visas after the completion of a lengthy application with supporting documentation.

The quotas established by the act also set strict limits on the number of new immigrants allowed after 1924. The number of Central and Eastern Europeans allowed to enter the US was dramatically reduced.

The 1924 quotas provided visas to a mere 2% of each nationality already in the US by 1890. They excluded immigrants from Asia completely, except for immigrants from Japan and the Philippines. The stated fundamental purpose of this immigration act was to preserve the ideal of US “homogeneity”.

Congress did not revise the act until 1952.

 

Why does this history matter?

The political climate of the interwar period has many similarities with the anti-immigrant and antisemitic environment today.

President Trump’s platform is comprised in large part of strongly anti-immigrant rhetoric. A Pew Charitable Trust survey shows that as many as 66% of registered voters who supported Trump consider immigration a “very big problem”, while only 17% of Hillary Clinton’s supporters said the same.

Moreover, 59% of Trump supporters actively associate “unauthorised immigrants with serious criminal behaviour.”

President Trump’s claims about the dangers posed by immigrants are not supported by facts; but they do indicate increased isolationism, nativism and right-wing nationalism within the US. All over again, we see anti-immigrant sentiment and antisemitism, going hand in hand.

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.

 

Ingrid Anderson

Ingrid Anderson has bachelors degrees in Literature and Women’s Studies, a Masters degree and a PhD in Jewish Studies. She specializes in modern and contemporary Jewish theology, philosophy, and political thought, and currently teaches courses on post-Holocaust ethics, global Judaisms, and the work of Elie Wiesel.

Related posts

Top
Share via