Yesterday, New Zealand’s new gun laws passed by a vast majority. However, the conversation on social media highlights the other part of the story.
In the wake of the Christchurch terror attack, and New Zealand’s subsequent ban on military-style semi-automatic weapons, social media has provided a platform for gun owners.
Media have examined the influence of the American National Rifle Association (NRA) in New Zealand. But there is an aggressive home-grown gun culture online.
Protecting “our” guns
The comment sections on a range of New Zealand firearms community Facebook pages reveal that the culture of many gun users is more extreme than the gun lobby wants us to believe. There are disturbing norms operating in local gun culture.
On the day of the shooting, some people posting on firearms groups’ Facebook pages expressed shock and sorrow. Others were immediately concerned about how it would affect them as firearms users. Contributors on some sites openly discussed watching the shooter’s livestream. Some Kiwi Gun Blog Facebook posters were interested in what firearms he used.
Started with shotgun, then uses his AR15 to do the rest.
Some contributors to the page mentioned the victims of the attack but many clearly prioritised the perceived harm to firearms owners.
Very sad day. My condolences go out to the families. Only one group of people going down after this…is licenced firearm owners unfortunately. Watch the sale of semi’s go through the roof before the ban is announced. Bury your semi’s now before they get taken off you.
Other users enthusiastically agreed. In response to a later post inquiring whether proposed gun law changes mean that “we would have to surrender our ar’s ”, a contributor replied, “lose them in a safe place.”
Another said of police:
…they will need a lot of search warrants and a team of people with spades.
Yet another added, mixing an American NRA trope with The Lord Of The Rings:
They will have to pull mine out of my cold dead hands. They will never get my precious.
A privilege, not a right
The second amendment to the American Constitution has been interpreted as meaning that citizens have a right to bear arms, but in New Zealand owning guns is indisputably a privilege, not a right. The government has the right to ban high calibre semi-automatics, magazines and associated parts and to demand that owners surrender these weapons.
A parliamentary select committee will hear oral submissions to the Arms Amendment Bill this week, and the bill is expected to pass into law by the end of next week, with limited exemptions including pest control, theatricals and farming.
The use of NRA discourses on New Zealand firearms sites reveals confusion, or perhaps a state of denial, about what is legally possible in New Zealand.
Owning a gun for self-defence purposes is not legal in New Zealand, but contributors frequently mention the concept along with variations on the right to own a gun.
We have found other NRA tropes on the New Zealand Deerstalkers Association Facebook page, inclusive of “Guns don’t kill people. People do”, and conspiracy theorists even raised claims that the shooting was a “false flag” event, staged specifically to discredit gun owners.
Firearms owners feeling threatened
When Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced the ban on semi-automatics, only days after the mosque shootings, the gun lobby responded quickly, expressing a sense of victimisation. The Facebook page of the Council of Licensed Firearms Owners (COLFO), a firearms umbrella organisation, carried a pastiche of Martin Niemöller’s poem, portraying firearms owners as needing to protect themselves in the face of oppression.
Since the shooting, new contributors arriving on the pages seem surprised by these discourses. One visitor unwittingly charged in with posts saying “ban all MSSAs , cars need registration. Drivers need licences…why should guns be any different. What legitimate use do MSSAs have in civilian hands.”
The suggestion that guns should be registered just as their owners are licensed did not go down well with regular commenters, who responded:
STOP terrorizing firearms owners! You extremist…you’re a disgusting human being.
Most comments come from men, judging by the names. This is unsurprising, given that 93% of licensed firearms owners in New Zealand are male. Violent misogyny appears on some of the pages, including many remarks about Ardern.
Threats resisted only because of the law
Very few contributors make actual threats, but any threatening posts were rejected on grounds of the law, not because violent or misogynist suggestions were unacceptable.
After New Zealand Police Association President Chris Cahill referred to the “radical gun lobby”, one post said, “if we were radical they’d be dead already.”
We did not find white supremacist sentiments, or overt racism on these public New Zealand Facebook pages. But there is almost no visible presence of Māori or non-Pākehā (non-white) people in the social media exchanges.
Senior gun lobbyists present licensed gun owners as sensible and responsible—the only legitimate voice on firearms. But these online posts reflect the culture within the group, whose voice has effectively stifled political debate and stymied changes to firearms law for decades.
Former police minister and now opposition MP Paula Bennett appointed two advisors from the gun lobby who encouraged her to reject 12 of 20 recommendations from the 2017 bi-partisan select committee report on illegal firearms.
In 2018, following a public outcry about defence personnel taking military firearms into a school, a Ministry of Education reference group developed guidelines for schools. The group initially included only government employees, educators and representatives from firearms groups. When challenged, one of us (Hera Cook) was added as a health representative and observed how firearms experts persuaded the ministry not to keep a list of schools with guns.
Gun owners’ social media posts show us that many firearms owners are not sensible and reasonable people. Faced with a tragedy, their response is to insist on a non-existent right to own firearms and to express willingness to break laws that do not suit them. It is past time that the desires of ordinary New Zealanders for peace and safety determined firearms policy.